Skip to main content

Configuring RAC logical disks AIX

There are two FC protocols, depending on whether an FC switch (fabric configuration) or an FC HUB (arbitrated loop) is used:


The nodes are connected directly to the ESS, excluding any network equipment. Choose Arbitrated Loop (al protocol). This is the default value.

The nodes are connected to a SAN, using a switch. Select Point-to-Point (pt2pt protocol).

Because our platform is using a switched SAN, the point-to-point protocol is selected on all nodes and ESS Fibre Channel adapters.

To view the actual value set on the FC adapter:

{node3:root}/-> lsattr -El fcs0
grep init_linkinit_link al INIT Link flags TrueTo change this value, use "smitty devices", select the FC Adapter menu, and change the field INIT Link flags. Or, you can use the command:

{node3:root}/-> chdev -l fcs0 -a init_link=pt2pt

If you are unsure about the way your nodes are connected to the disk subsystems, choose init_link=al. This setting first tries to detect a switch. If that fails, it changes to arbitrated loop. It is like an auto detect feature. The FC adapter will recognize the device it is connected to, that is, FC hub or switch.

Check whether all fiber cables are connected (nodes to FC switch, FC switch to ESS). This step assumes that the ESS storage configuration has been performed and checked.

For consistency, we recommend that you remove any previous definition of the FC adapters and their child devices, then run a fresh cfgmgr. On each node and for each FC adapter, issue:

{node3:root}/-> rmdev -Rdl fcs0

{node3:root}/-> cfgmgr

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to configure multipath Debian CentOS for IBM Storage

This detailed how to guides to achieve high availability and performance on Debian and CentOS for accessing storage space at IBM DS8300 Data Storage Systems. Tested on Debian GNU/Linux 5.x Lenny 64 bits and CentOS 5.3 64 bits running on 8 cores blades, with Host Bus Adapters Qlogic and Emulex Light Pulse Fiber Channel in deployed systems at SERPRO . Observations showed that Debian Lenny has the best performance, for our app load profile and hardware. Also, there are listed a number of previously not clearly documented critical pitfalls to avoid. STUDY whole articles, hints, implications, and cited resources before planning your deployment. Every detail matters . Before start, you must have LUNs at IBM DS8300 storage configured for high availability and performance as explained at the article How to configure maximum performance storage space for Debian GNU/Linux on IBM DS 8300 Data Storage Systems . Multipath and storage basic concepts In order t...

ipsec tunnel pfSense and Centos

pfSense 1.2.3 -------- external ip: 1.1.1.1 internal ip: 172.20.1.20 internal network: 172.20.1.0/24 Centos 5.5 -------- external ip: 2.2.2.2 internal ip: 172.20.2.1 internal network: 172.20.2.0/24 pfSense config from a reset. Firewall rule to allow all ipsec communication (all protocols). pfSense ipsec config -------------------- Mode: Tunnel Interface: WAN (I'm not sure this should be WAN, but changing it to LAN makes no difference) Local subnet: 172.20.1.0/24 Remote subnet: 172.20.2.0/24 Remote gateway: 2.2.2.2 Phase 1 Negotiation mode: agressive My identifier: My IP adress Encryption algorithm: 3DES Hash algorithm: SHA1 DH key group: 2 Authentication method: Pre-shared key Pre-Shared Key: secret Phase 2 Protocol: ESP Encryption algorithms: Rijndael (AES) Hash algorithms: SHA1 PFS key group: 2   Centos ipsec config ------------------- /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ipsec0 TYPE=IPSEC ...

apt-get, aptitude, autoremove and orphans

Until some weeks ago I used to use only apt-get, and then I realized that aptitude is better in taking care of orphan packages. I am no expert here, but this is the way I think they both work, at least on Debian Etch, I have heard that in Lenny both works more or less the same, I use Lenny, and yes they can do the same thing but in different ways. Well when you install a package with apt-get, and that packages needs other packages due to dependencies, it will install all of them for you, which is great, but then when you want to remove the installed package, apt-get will let the automatically installed packages in your PC, while aptitude will rid them away. Aptitude marks all installed packages as "manual installed" and "automatically installed", the first are those you explicitly ask it to install and the latter are those which it decided to install by you, because they are needed, so when you ask aptitude to remove a package it will remove also the automatical...